interSAE implements joint margin-constrained
intersectional small area estimation from complex-survey microdata and
aggregate census margins.
The motivating problem is common in official statistics: a survey observes an outcome and several demographic variables, while published census tables give precise but overlapping margins rather than a full confidential microdata file. Direct survey estimates become unstable or unavailable after crossing a small geographic area with age, sex, residence, or another subgroup.
install.packages("interSAE_0.1.0.tar.gz", repos = NULL, type = "source")The core package uses only R recommended packages. Install
lpSolve to compute identification bounds.
library(interSAE)
x <- inter_example()
design <- inter_design(
x$survey,
weights = "weight",
area = "area",
strata = "strata",
psu = "psu"
)
margins <- census_margins(x$margins)
fit <- fit_inter_sae(
unemployed ~ sex + age + residence + area,
design = design,
margins = margins,
family = "binomial",
domain = c("area", "sex")
)
inter_estimates(fit)
margin_diagnostics(fit)
check_identifiability(fit)Optional sensitivity analysis:
if (requireNamespace("lpSolve", quietly = TRUE)) {
inter_sensitivity(
fit,
gamma = c(1, 1.25, 1.5, 2, Inf),
domain = list(area = "A1", sex = "Female")
)
}The fitted point estimate depends on the outcome model and on a coherent population reconstruction seeded by the weighted survey association structure. When aggregate margins do not identify the full joint table, the package says so explicitly. Identification bounds vary the latent joint table while holding published census margins fixed. Bootstrap intervals and identification bounds answer different questions and should be reported separately.
This release is a research implementation for categorical census dimensions and Gaussian or binary survey outcomes. It does not claim that aggregate margins alone identify a confidential joint population distribution. Applied work should document the outcome formula, structural zeros, sensitivity values, survey design, and benchmarking decisions.